Ineffective normobaric LHTL: room confinement or inappropriate training intensity?
نویسندگان
چکیده
TO THE EDITOR: To explain an ineffective live high-train low (LHTL) in normobaric hypoxia (e.g., where the athletes slept in hypoxic chamber), Siebenman et al. (4) suggested that the recommended 16 h/day of room confinement may lead to a reduction in plasma volume: 13.8% and 20.1% in the placebo and LHTL group after 3 wk, respectively. To our view, this argument is not relevant for the following reasons. In a Nordic ski study (2), the control group showed an 11.2% reduction in blood volume despite that they were not requested to stay in a room since the study was not blinded. These subjects were not maintained in a “room confinement.” In bed rest studies with 6° head-down tilt for 2 wk or in a horizontal position (1), the plasma volume reduction ranged between 9 and 13%, i.e., lesser than the decrease observed in the Siebenman et al. (4) study despite a much more constraining protocol. Finally, we point out that the subjects were not requested to stay in their room after the hypoxic period (i.e., W 1 POST and W 2 POST). During these 15 days, the subjects were back to “normal” life and training whereas their plasma and blood volumes remained significantly lower than the baseline values. In our view, on the basis of the detailed analysis of the training content, a hypothesis centered on an inappropriate training can explain more objectively the effects observed in this study. During the LHTL exposure (W 1 to W 4), at least 30% of the training time was spent above 80% maximal heart rate (HRmax) with 8% of time above 90% HRmax. This distribution of intensity of training is in contradiction with the training usually observed in the high-level endurance sport (3) where “polarized” training is as follows: 80 to 90% of the training time at an intensity less than 75–80% HRmax, 5 to 10% between 80% to 90% of HRmax, and 5 to 10% higher than 90% HRmax. This observation of an inappropriate (i.e., too intensive training) performed is even more relevant when the training is combined with hypoxic stimulus as in the LHTL group.
منابع مشابه
"Live high-train low" using normobaric hypoxia: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.
The combination of living at altitude and training near sea level [live high-train low (LHTL)] may improve performance of endurance athletes. However, to date, no study can rule out a potential placebo effect as at least part of the explanation, especially for performance measures. With the use of a placebo-controlled, double-blinded design, we tested the hypothesis that LHTL-related improvemen...
متن کامل“Living High-Training Low” improved weight loss and glucagon-like peptide-1 level in a 4-week weight loss program in adolescents with obesity
BACKGROUND "Living High-Training Low" (LHTL) is effective for the improvement of athletic ability; however, little is known about the effect of LHTL on obese individuals. The present study determined whether LHTL would have favorable influence on body composition, rebalance the appetite hormones, and explore the underlying mechanism. METHODS Adolescents with obesity [body mass index (BMI) >30...
متن کاملProoxidant/Antioxidant Balance in Hypoxia: A Cross-Over Study on Normobaric vs. Hypobaric “Live High-Train Low”
"Live High-Train Low" (LHTL) training can alter oxidative status of athletes. This study compared prooxidant/antioxidant balance responses following two LHTL protocols of the same duration and at the same living altitude of 2250 m in either normobaric (NH) or hypobaric (HH) hypoxia. Twenty-four well-trained triathletes underwent the following two 18-day LHTL protocols in a cross-over and random...
متن کاملFour weeks of normobaric "live high-train low" do not alter muscular or systemic capacity for maintaining pH and K⁺ homeostasis during intense exercise.
It was investigated if athletes subjected to 4 wk of living in normobaric hypoxia (3,000 m; 16 h/day) while training at 800-1,300 m ["live high-train low" (LHTL)] increase muscular and systemic capacity for maintaining pH and K(+) homeostasis as well as intense exercise performance. The design was double-blind and placebo controlled. Mean power during 30-s all-out cycling was similar before and...
متن کاملCorrection: Comparison of “Live High-Train Low” in Normobaric versus Hypobaric Hypoxia
We investigated the changes in both performance and selected physiological parameters following a Live High-Train Low (LHTL) altitude camp in either normobaric hypoxia (NH) or hypobaric hypoxia (HH) replicating current "real" practices of endurance athletes. Well-trained triathletes were split into two groups (NH, n = 14 and HH, n = 13) and completed an 18-d LHTL camp during which they trained ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of applied physiology
دوره 112 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012